pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2024; 3(69): 210-233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2024.03.210
UDC 016:[597-116:597.583.1+639.371.64]

Тематична англомовна бібліографія щодо особливостей відтворення та перших етапів онтогенезу судака (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758)

М. Ю. Симон, Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її. , Інститут рибного господарства НААН, м. Київ
О. М. Поліщук, Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її. , ВСП «Немішаївський фаховий коледж НУБіП України», с. Немішаєве

Мета. Створити загальний бібліографічний перелік англомовних наукових публікацій, присвячених особливостям відтворення судака (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758) в природних та штучних умовах, за різноманітними технологіями, а також коротко висвітлити англомовні фахові джерела, в яких основна увага приділена специфіці розвитку судака на перших етапах онтогенезу — починаючи від ембріонального розвитку та закінчуючи віком цьоголітки.

Методика. Для створення даної тематичної англомовної бібліографії було застосовано міждисциплінарний підхід. Його використання було засноване на практичному застосуванні принципів аналітики та систематики. Своєю чергою, межі аплікативності останніх були окреслені цілісним та вибірковим методами. Власне бібліографічне ядро становлять джерела, що у переважній більшості розміщені в мережі Інтернет, здебільшого у вільному доступі до повного тексту.

Результати. Укладено тематичну англомовну бібліографію зі 149 закордонних джерел. Усі вони розміщенів алфавітному порядку за автором чи назвою та оформлені згідно з вимогами Державного стандарту України (ДСТУ 8302:2015 «Інформація та документація. Бібліографічне посилання. Загальні положення та правила складання», із урахуванням поправок — код УКНД 01.140.40) та найпоширенішого міжнародного стандарту (APA style). Абсолютна більшість згаданих джерел опубліковані в останні 25 років, у загальнознаних міжнародних журналах («Aquaculture International», «Aquaculture Report», «Aquatic Research», «Biologia», «Czech Journal of Animal Science», «Ecology of Freshwater Fish», «Fish Physiology and Biochemistry», «Journal of Applied Ichthyology», «Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems», «North American Journal of Aquaculture», «Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences» тощо).

Практична значимість. Представлена тематична англомовна бібліографія може бутивикористана в освітній, науково-дослідній, організаційній та інших видах діяльності, дотичних до проблематики відтворення та збереження водних живих біоресурсів в Україні та в інших країнах світу. Наведені в ній джерела поглиблять та доповнять знання науковців та виробничників щодо особливостей відтворення та онтогенезу судака на етапах від гаструли до віку цьоголітки.

Ключові слова: судак (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758), аквакультура, відтворення, ембріогенез, онтогенез, личинки, молодь, цьоголітки.

ЛІТЕРАТУРА

  1. A new classification of pre-ovulatory oocyte maturation stages in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), and its application during artificial reproduction / Żarski D. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2011. № 43. Р. 713—721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02879.x.
  2. Acute and chronic nitrite toxicity in juvenile pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) and its compensation by chloride / Wuertz S. et al. // Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2013. № 157(4). Р. 352—360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2013.01.002.
  3. Adaptation to pelleted feed in pikeperch fingerlings: Learning from the trainer fish over gradual adaptation from natural food / Lepič P. et al. // Aquatic Living Resource. 2017. № 30. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2017008.
  4. Alcalase enzyme treatment affects egg incubation and larval quality in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) / Ljubobratovic U. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2019. № 27. Р.917—929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0323-6.
  5. Benefits of hormone treatment of both sexes in semi-artificial reproduction of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) / Blecha M. et al. // Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2016. № 61(5). Р. 203—208. https://doi.org/10.17221/60/2015-CJAS.
  6. Bienkiewicz M. Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Olsztyn : Institute rybnogo gospodarstva, 2007.
  7. Blecha M., Kristan J., Policar T. Adaptation of intensively reared pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) juveniles to pond culture and subsequent re-adaptation to a recirculation aquaculture system // Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2016. № 16.Р. 15—18. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v16_1_02.
  8. Bоdis M., Kucska B., Bercsеnyi M. The effect of different diets on the growth and mortality of juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in the transition from live food to formulated feed // Aquaculture International. 2007. № 15. Р. 83—90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-006-9063-0.
  9. Bоdis M., Bercsеnyi M. The effect of different daily feed rations on the growth, condition, survival and feed conversion of juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) reared with dry feed in net cages // Aquaculture International.2009. № 17. Р. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9226-2.
  10. Buijse A. D., Houthuijzen R. P. Piscivory, growth and size-selective mortality of age 0 pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) // Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Acuaculture Sciences. 2011. № 49.Р. 894—902. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-100.
  11. Characterization of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) milt collected with a syringe and a catheter / Sarosiek B. et al. // Aquaculture. 2016. № 450. Р. 14—16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.040.
  12. Comparative study of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Percidae; Linnaeus, 1758) eggs and larvae from wild females or from captive females fed chopped marine fish / Khemis I. B. et al. // Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014. № 40. Р. 375—384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-013-9850-2.
  13. Comparison of two weaning methods of juvenile pikeperch Sander lucioperca from natural diet to commercial feed / Baranek V. et al. // Mendel Net. 2007. № 7. C. 1—7.
  14. Comparison of efficiencies of using trainer fish and shape or taste modified feed for enchancing direct weaning of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) yearlings on dry feed / Horvаth Z. et al. // Croatian Journal of Fisheries. 2013. № 71(4). Р. 151—158. https://doi.org/10.14798/71.4.688.
  15. Comparison of production efficiency and quality of differently cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) juveniles as a valuable product for ongrowing culture / Policar T. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2016. № 24. Р.1607—1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0050-9.
  16. Comparison of the procedures for adhesiveness removal in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) eggs with special emphasis on the effect of tannic acid / Ljubobratovic U. et al. // Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences. 2017. № 17. Р. 461—469. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v17_3_02.
  17. Continuous lighting inhibits the onset of reproductive cycle in pikeperch males and females / Ammar I. B. et al. // Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015. № 41(2). P. 345—356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-014-9987-7.
  18. Cryopreservation of pikeperch sperm in hatchery conditions / Bokor Z. et al. // Israeli Journal of Aquaculture. 2008. № 60. Р. 168—171. https://doi.org10.46989/001c.20493.
  19. Do addition of perch larvae as prey affect the growth, development and cannibalism rate of pikeperch larvae? / Colchen T. et al. // Fishes. 2019. № 4(21). Р. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes4010021.
  20. Demska-Żakęś K., Żakęś Z. Sex differentiation in pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) // Archiwum Rybactwa Polskiego. 1995. № 3. Р. 51—57.
  21. Demska-Żakęś K., Żakęś Z. Controlled spawning of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)in lake cages // Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2002. № 47. Р. 230—238.
  22. Demska-Żakęś K., Kowalska A., Żakęś Z. The development of the swim bladder of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) reared in intensive culture // Archive Polish Fisheries. 2003. № 11. Р.45—55.
  23. Demska-Żakęś K., Żakęś Z., Roszuk J. The use of tannic acid to remove adhesiveness from pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, eggs // Aquaculture Research. 2005. № 36. Р. 1458—1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01370.x.
  24. Densen W. L. T., Vijverberg J. The relations between 0+ fish density, zooplankton size and the vulnerability of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca, to angling in the Frisian lakes // Hydrobiologia. 1982. № 95.Р.321—336. https://doi.org10.1007/BF00044493.
  25. Development of yolk complex, liver and anterior intestine in pike-perch larvae, Stizostedion lucioperca (Percidae), according to the first diet during rearing / Mani-Ponset L. еt al. // Aquatic Living Resource. 1994. № 7. Р. 191—202. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:1994021.
  26. Development, and effect of water temperature on develompent rate, of pikeperch Sander lucioperca embryos / Güralp H. et al. // Theriogenology. 2017. № 104. Р.94—104.
  27. Diet patterns and ontogenetic diet shift of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) fry in lakes Peipsi and Võrtsjärv (Estonia) / Ginter K. et al. // Hydrobiologia. 2011. № 660.Р. 79—91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0393-6.
  28. Differential protein expression profile in the liver of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae fed with increasing levels of phospholipid / Hamza N. et al. // Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2010. № 5. Р. 130—137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2010.03.005.
  29. Dynamics of Total Body Fatty Acids During Early Ontogeny of Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) Larvae / Abi-Ayad S. M. A. et al. // Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2004. № 30. C. 129—136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-005-3417-9.
  30. Early development of the skull of Sander lucioperca (L.) (Teleostei: Percidae) relating to growth and mortality / Löffler J. et al. // Journal of Fish Biology. 2008. № 72. Р. 233—258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01699.x.
  31. Early development of the postcranial skeleton of the pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Teleostei: Percidae) relating to developmental stages and growth / Ott A. et al. // Journal Morphology. 2012. № 273. Р. 894—908. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20029.
  32. Early embryonic development in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) related to micromanipulation / Güralp H. et al. // Czech Journal of Animal Sciences. 2016. № 61.Р. 273—280. https://doi.org/10.17221/35/2015-CJAS.
  33. Early development and the point of no return in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) larvae / Xu Z. C. et al. // Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2017. № 35. Р. 1493—1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-017-6042-4.
  34. Efficacy of different anaesthetics for pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) in relation to water temperature / Křišťan J. et al. // Neuroendocrinology Letter. 2014. № 35. Р. 81—85.
  35. Effect of dietary protein, lipid and carbo-hydrate ratio on growth, feed efficiency and body composition of pikeperch Sander lucioperca fingerlings / Nyina-Wamwiza L. еt al. // Aquaculture Research. 2005. № 36. Р. 486—492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01233.x.
  36. Effect of weaning age and diet on pikeperch larviculture / Kestemont P. et al. // Aquaculture. 2007. № 264. Р.197—204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.034.
  37. Effect of feeding frequency on growth and size in juvenile pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) / Żakęś Z. et al. // Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2006. № 51. Р. 85—91. https://doi.org/10.17221/3914-CJAS.
  38. Effect of dietary protein on growth, feed conversion, body composition and survival of pike perch fingerlings / Schulz C. et al. // Aquaculture Nutrition. 2007. № 13. Р. 373—380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00487.x.
  39. Effect of two medicinal herbs (Astragalus radix and Lonicera japonica) on growth performance and body composition of juvenile pikeperch Sander lucioperca / Żakęś Z. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2008. № 39. Р.1149—1160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01977.x.
  40. Effect of dietary phospholipid levels on performance, enzyme activities and fatty acid composition of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae / Hamza N. et al. // Aquaculture. 2008. № 225. Р.274—282. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aquaculture.2008.01.014.
  41. Effect of partial or total replacement of forage fish by a dry diet on the quality of reproduction in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca / Wang N. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2009. № 40. Р. 376—383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02108.x.
  42. Effect of size sorting on the survival, growth and cannibalism in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) larvae during intensive culture in RAS / Szczepkowski M. et al. // Czech Journal Animal Science. 2011. № 56(11). Р. 483—489. https://doi.org/10.17221/ 3837-CJAS.
  43. Effect of different commercial spawning agents and thermal regime on the effectiveness of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), reproduction under controlled conditions / Żarski D. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2013. № 21(4). Р. 819—828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9597-2.
  44. Effects of dietary protein: fat ratios on metabolism, body composition and growth of juvenile pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) / Żakęś Z. et al. // Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2001. № 46. Р. 27—33.
  45. Effects of varying dietary fatty acid profile on growth performance, fatty acid, body and tissue composition of juvenile pike perch (Sander lucioperca) / Schulz C. et al. // Aquaculture Nutrition. 2005. № 11(6). Р.403—413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2005.00369.x.
  46. Effects of varying dietary protein to lipid ratios on growth performance and body composition of juvenile pike perch (Sander lucioperca) / Schulz C. et al. // Aquaculture Nutrition. 2008. № 14. Р. 166—173. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00516.x.
  47. Effects of four factors on the quality of male reproductive cycle in pikeperch Sander lucioperca / Teletchea F. et al. // Aquaculture. 2009. № 291(3–4). Р. 217‒223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.029.
  48. Effects of different photoperiods and handling stress on spawning and reproductive performance of pikeperch Sander lucioperca / Pourhosein-Saramech S. et al. // Animal Reproduction Science. 2012. № 132(3). Р.213—222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.011.
  49. Effects of first feeding regime on growth performance, survival rate and development of digestive system in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae / Imentai A. et al. // Aquaculture. 2020. № 529. Р. 735—636. https://doi.org/j. aquaculture.2020.735636.
  50. Evaluation of different feeding frequencies in RAS-based juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) aquaculture / Pěnka T. et al. // Aquaculture. 2023. № 562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738815.
  51. Falahatkar B., Poursaeid S. Effects of hormonal manipulation on stress responses in male and female broodstocks of pikeperch Sander lucioperca // Aquaculture International. 2014. № 22(1). Р. 235—244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9678-x.
  52. Fate or independency: is batch-specific larval performance determined by egg traits? A case study in farmed pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) / Schaefer F. J. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2019. № 27.Р. 957—969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00356-8.
  53. Franz G. P., Lewerentz L., Grunow B. Observations of growth changes during the embryonic-larval-transition of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) under near-natural conditions // Journal of Fisheries Biology. 2021. № 99.Р.425—436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14734.
  54. German experiences in the propagation and rearing of fingerling pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) / Steffens W. et al. // Annales Zoologici Fennici.1996. № 33. Р. 627—634.
  55. Growth performance of juvenile pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) fed graded levels of dietary lipids / Żakęś Z. et al. // Czech Journal Animal Science. 2004. № 49(4). Р. 156—163. https://doi.org/10.17221/4294-CJAS.
  56. Growth in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) stimulated with yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, extract / Jarmołowicz S. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2018. № 49. Р.614—620. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13490.
  57. Growth rate and histological picture of the gonads of pike, Esox lucius L., and pike-perch Sander lucioperca (L.) from the Tresna reservoir (Lake Żywieckie) / Epler P. et al. // Archive Polish Fisheries. 2008. № 18(2). Р. 147—154. https://doi.org/10.2478/s10086-008-0012-6.
  58. Hamza N., Mhetli M., Kestemont P. Effects of weaning age and diets on ontogeny of digestive activities and structures of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae // Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2007. № 33(2). Р. 121—133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-006-9123-4.
  59. Heikinheimo O., Pekcan-Hekim Z., Raitaniemi J. Spawning stock–recruitment relationship in pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in the Baltic Sea, with temperature as an environmental effect // Fisheries Research. 2014. № 155. Р. 1—9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.015.
  60. Hilge V., Steffens W. Aquaculture of fry and fingerling of pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca L.) a short review // Journal Applied Ichthyology. 1996. № 12(3‒4). Р. 167—170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1996.tb00083.x.
  61. Hormonal induction of ovulation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and mammalian GnRH analogue / Křišťan J. et al. // Aquaulture International. 2013. № 21. Р.811—818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9572-y.
  62. Immersion mass marking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae in oxytetracycline hydrochloride and its detection using fluorescence microscopy / Blabolil P. et al. // Biologia. 2018. № 73. C. 531—535. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0057-y.
  63. Impact of light intensity on the results of rearing juvenile pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), in recirculating aquaculture systems / Kozłowski M. et al. // Archives of Polish Fisheries. 2010. № 18(2). Р. 77—84. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-010-0009-9.
  64. Impact of intraperitoneal and intramuscular PIT tags on survival, growth and tag retention in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) / Hopko M. et al. // Archives of Polish Fisheries. 2010. № 18(2). Р.85—92. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-010-0010-3.
  65. Impact of spawning season on fillet quality of wild pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) / Tönißen K. et al. // European Food Research and Technology. 2022. № 248. Р. 1277—1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-03963-7.
  66. Improving pikeperch larviculture by combining environmental, feeding and populational factors / Colchen T. et al. // Aquaculture Report. 2020. № 17. Р.1—10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100337.
  67. Induction of ovulation in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) by ovarian lavage / Nemeth A. et al. // Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2012. № 28. Р. 914—915. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12067.
  68. Influence of temperature on puberty and maturation of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca / Hermelink B. et al. // General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2011. № 172(2). Р. 282—292. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.ygcen.2011.03.013.
  69. Influence of batch-specific biochemical egg characteristics on embryogenesis and hatching success in farmed pikeperch / Schaefer F. J. et al. // Animal. 2018. № 12(11). Р. 2327—2334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003202.
  70. Influence of salinity and linoleic or alpha-linolenic acid-based diets on ontogenetic development and metabolism of unsaturated fatty acids in pike perch larvae (Sander lucioperca) / Lund I. еt al. // Aquaculture. 2019. № 500. Р. 550—561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.10.061.
  71. Influence of habitat on abundance, size and growth rate of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) 0+ juveniles in a canyon-shaped reservoir / Blabolil P. et al. // Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 2023. № 32(4). Р. 703—711. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12709.
  72. Intensive culture of walleye larvae produced out of season and during regular season spawning / Dabrowski K. et al. // North American Journal of Aquaculture. 2000. № 62. Р. 219—224. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8454(2000)062<0219:ICOWLP>2.3.CO;2.
  73. Inter- and intra-individual variability in growth and food consumption in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca L., larvae revealed by individual rearing / Schaefer F. J. et al. // Aquatic Research. 2017. № 48(3). Р. 800—808. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12924.
  74. Intra-cohort cannibalism in early life stages of pikeperch / Colchen T. et al. // Aquatic Research.2019. № 50(3).Р.915—924. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/are.13966.
  75. Introduction of rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) during pikeperch first feeding / Yanes-Roca C. et al. // Aquaculture. 2018. № 497.Р.260—268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.004.
  76. Jarmolowicz S., Zakęś Z. Amino acid profile in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) — impact of supplementing feed with yeast extract // Archive Polish Fisheries. 2014. № 22(2). Р. 135—143. https://doi.org/10.2478/aopf-2014-0013.
  77. Key nutritional factors and interactions during larval development of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) / El Kertaoui N. et al. // Scientific Reports. 2019. № 9(1). Р.1—15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43491-1650654731068643.
  78. Kirjasniemi M., Valtonen T. Winter mortality of young-of-the-year pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) // Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 1997. № 6(3). Р. 155—160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.1997.tb00158.x.
  79. Kowalska A., Zakęś Z., Demska-Zakęś K. The impact of feeding on the results of rearing larval pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), with regard to the development of the digestive tract // Electronic journal of Polish agricultural universities. 2006. № 9(2). Р.1—10.
  80. Křišťan J., Blecha M., Рolicar T. Alcalase treatment for elimination of stickiness in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) eggs under controlled conditions // Aquaculture Research. 2015. № 47(12). Р. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12850.
  81. Król J., Zakęś Z. Effect of dietary L-tryptophan on cannibalism, survival and growth in pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) post-larvae // Aquaculture International. 2016. № 24. Р. 441—451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9936-1.
  82. Kucharczyk D., Kestemont P., Mamcarz A. Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Olsztyn, Poland : University of Warmia and Mazury, 2007.
  83. Lahnsteiner F., Mansour N. Sperm fine structure of the pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Percidae, Teleostei) // Journal of Submicroscopy and Pathology. 2004. № 36. Р.309—312.
  84. Lappalainen J., Lehtonen H., Erm V. Possible effects of climate warming on the timing of spawning, abundance and catches of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) // Boreal Environmental Research. 1997. № 2. Р. 85—91.
  85. Lappalainen J., Dörner H., Wysujak K. Reproduction biology of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) — a review // Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 2003. № 12(2). Р. 95—106. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00005.x.
  86. Lappalainen J., Olin M., Vinni M. Pikeperch cannibalism: effects of abundance, size and condition // Annales Zollogici Fennici. 2006. № 43. Р. 35—44.
  87. Length rather than year-round spawning, affects reproductive performance of RAS-reared F-generation pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) — Insights from practice / Schaefer F. J. et al. // Journal Applied Ichthyology. 2018. № 34. Р. 617—621. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13628.
  88. Ljubobratoviс U., Peter G., Horvath Z. Effect of parental origin on dry feed habituation and Intensive on-growing results in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) offspring // Turkish Journal Fisheries Aquaculture Sciences. 2018. № 18. Р. 425—433.
  89. Ljunggren L. Growth response of pike-perch larvae in relation to body size and zooplankton abundance // Journal of Fish Biology. 2005. № 60(2). Р. 405—414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb00289.x.
  90. Light intensity preference of juvenile pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) / Luchiari A. C. et al. // Aquatic Research. 2006. № 37. Р. 1572—1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01599.x.
  91. Longer wavelengths of light improve the growth, intake and feed efficiency of individually reared juvenile pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) / Luchiari A. C. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2011. № 40. Р.880—886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02160.x.
  92. Lund I., Steenfeldt S. J. The effects of dietary long-chain essential fatty acids on growth and stress tolerance in pikeperch larvae (Sander lucioperca L.) // Aquaculture Nutrition. 2011. № 17(2). Р. 191—199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00724.x.
  93. Lund I., Skov P. V., Hansen B. W. Dietary supplementation of essential fatty acids in larval pikeperch (Sander lucioperca); short- and long-term effects on stress tolerance and metabolic physiology // Comparative Biochemistry Physic. 2012. № 162(4). Р. 340—348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.04.004.
  94. Management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) sperm quality after stripping / Schaefer F. J. et al. // Journal Applied Ichthyology. 2016. № 32.Р.1099—1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13144.
  95. Milt dilution effectiveness on pike-perch Sander lucioperca sperm and DNA activation / Korbuly B. et al. // Zootehnie şi Biotechnologii. 2009. № 42. Р. 65—70.
  96. Müller-Belecke A., Zienert S. Out-of-season spawning of pike perch (Sander lucioperca L.) without the need for hormonal treatments // Aquaculture Research. 2008. № 39. Р. 1279—1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01991.x.
  97. Natural vs. controlled rearing conditions in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) fingerlings — a histological approach at the liver and intestine level / Dumitrescu G. et al. // Romanian biotechnological letters. 2014. № 19(4). Р.9531—9542.
  98. Németh Á., Szűcs E., Szathmári L. Preliminary study of different hormone treatments in the artificial propagation of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) regarding the aspects of animal welfare // Zootehnie şi Biotechnologii. 2009. № 42(2). Р. 78—83.
  99. Nursing of Pike-Perch (Sander lucioperca) in Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) Provides Growth Advantage in Juvenile Growth Phase / Pеter G. et al. // Animals. 2023. № 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030347.
  100. Ostaszewska T. Developmental changes of digestive system structures in pike-perch (Sander lucioperca L.) // Electronic journal of ichthyology. 2005. № 2. Р.65—78.
  101. Ostaszewska T., Boruta A. The effect of diet on the fatty acid composition and liver histology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) larvae // Archive Polish Fisheries. 2006. № 14(1). Р. 53—66.
  102. Pekcan-Hekim Z., Lappalainen J. Effects of clay turbidity and density of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae on predation by perch (Perca fluviatilis) // Naturwissenschaften. 2006. № 93. Р. 356—359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0114-1.
  103. Peterka J., Matіna J., Lipka J. The diet and growth of larval and juvenile pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)): a comparative study of fishponds and a reservoir // Aquaculture International.2003. № 11.Р. 337—348. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025791208123.
  104. Photo-thermal manipulation for the reproductive management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca / Hermelink B. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2016. № 25. Р. 1—20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0009-x.
  105. Photo-thermal manipulation for the reproductive management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca / Hermelink B. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2017. № 25. Р. 1—20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0009-x.
  106. Physiological changes in male and female pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) subjected to different photoperiods and handling stress during the reproductive season / Pourhosein-Sarameh S. et al. // Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2013. № 39. Р.1253—1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-013-9780-z.
  107. Pike-perch larvae growth in response to administration of lactobacilli-enriched inert feed during first feeding / Ljubobratovic U. et al. // Aquaculture. 2021. № 542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736901.
  108. Post-spawning bath treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality of pond-cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) broodstock / Policar T. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2016. № 27. Р.1065—1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00392-4.
  109. Primary and secondary responses of juveniles of a teleostean, pikeperch Sander lucioperca, and a chondrostean, Persian sturgeon Acipenser persicus, to handling during transport / Falahatkar B. et al. // North American Journal of Aquaculture. 2012. № 74(2). Р. 241—250. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15222055.2012.675988.
  110. Quality and quantity of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) spermatozoa after varying cold-water treatments / Blecha M. et al. // Journal of Applied Ichthyology. (31). 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12853.
  111. Rearing of pike-perch larvae using formulated diets — first success with starter feeds / Ostaszewska T. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2005. № 36(12). Р. 1167—1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01332.x.
  112. Reproductive performance of indoor-reared pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) females after wintering in outdoor earthen ponds / Ljubobratovic U. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2017. № 48(9). Р.4851—4863. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13305.
  113. Rоnyai A. Induced out-of-season and seasonal tank spawning and stripping of pike perch (Sander lucioperca L.) // Aquaculture Research. 2007. № 38(11). Р. 1144—1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01778.x.
  114. Ronyai A., Csengeri I. Effect of feeding regime and temperature on ongrowing results of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) // Aquaculture Research,2008. № 39(8). Р.820—827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01935.x.
  115. Ruuhijärvi J., Salminen M., Nurmio T. Releases of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) fingerlings in lakes with no established pikeperch stock // Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1996. № 33(3). Р. 553—567.
  116. Salminen M., Ruuhijärvi J., Ahlfors P. Spawning of wild zander (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in cages // Fish Reproduction : Scientific Conference : proceed. Vodnany : Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, 1993. P. 42—47.
  117. Schlumberger O., Proteau J. P. Reproduction of pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca L.) in captivity // Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2007. № 12(3–4). Р. 149—152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1996.tb00080.x.
  118. Size heterogeneity, cannibalism and competition in cultured predatory fish larvae: biotic and abiotic influences / Kestemont P. et al. // Aquaculturе. 2003. № 227. Р.333—356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00513-1.
  119. Sperm morphology, ultrastructure, and motility in pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Percidae, Teleostei) associated with various activation media / Křišťan J. et al. // Czech Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014. № 59(1).Р.1—10. https://doi.org/10.17221/7188-CJAS.
  120. Steenfeldt S., Lund I., Höglund E. Is batch variability in hatching time related to size heterogeneity and cannibalism in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquaculture Research. 2011. № 42(5). Р. 727—732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02681.x.
  121. Sutela T., Hyvärinen P. Diet and growth of stocked and wild 0 + pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) // Fisheries Management and Ecology. 2002. № 9. Р.57—63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2002.00251.x.
  122. Swim bladder inflation failure in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae in pond culture / Blecha M. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2019. № 27. Р. 983—989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00361-x.
  123. Szkudlarek M., Zakęś Z. The effect of stock density on the effectiveness of rearing pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) summer fry // Archive Polish Fisheries. 2002. № 10. Р. 115—119.
  124. Szkudlarek M., Ƶakḛš Z. Effect of stocking density on survival and growth performance of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), larvae under controlled conditions. Aquaculture International. 2007. № 15. Р.67—81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499–006– 9069–7.
  125. Temperature control of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) maturation in recirculating aquaculture systems — induction of puberty and course of gametogenesis / Hermelink B. et al. // Aquaculture. 2013. № 400—401. Р. 36—45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.026.
  126. The application of tannic acid to the elimination of egg stickiness at varied moments of the egg swelling process in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) / Żarski D. et al. // Aquaculture Research. 2013. № 46. Р.324—334. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12183.
  127. The effect of initial stocking density on growth and survival of pike-perch fingerlings reared under intensive conditions / Molnаr T. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2004. № 12. Р.181—189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AQUI.0000032079.62056.8c.
  128. The effect of fish size and stocking density on the weaning success of pond-cultured pikeperch Sander lucioperca L. juveniles / Policar T. et al. // Aquaculture International. 2013. № 21. Р. 869—882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9563-z.
  129. The effects of diet and stocking density on the growth and behavior of pond pre-reared pikeperch under intensive conditions / Molnаr T. et al. // Journal Applied Ichthyology. 2004. № 20. Р. 105—109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00529.x.
  130. The importance of phospholipids combined with long-chain PUFA in formulated diets for pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae / Lund I. еt al. // British Journal Nutrition. 2018. № 120. Р.628—644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114518001794.
  131. The effect of different surface-cleaning devices on the success of swim bladder inflation in zander larvae / Fazekas G. et al. // North American Journal of Aquaculture. 2021. № 83. Р. 78—82. https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10172.
  132. Tielmann M., Schulz C., Meyer S. Self-grading of larval pike-perch (Sander lucioperca), triggered by positive phototaxis // Aquaculture Engineering. 2016. № 72–73. Р. 13—19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.03.001.
  133. Tielmann M., Schulz C., Meyer S. (2017). The effect of light intensity on performance of larval pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) // Aquaculture Engineering. 2017. № 77. Р. 61—71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.03.001.
  134. Trait-related variation in the reproductive characteristics of female pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) / Olin M. et al. // Fish Managemant Ecology. 2018. № 25. Р.220—232. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12280.
  135. Transition of Wild-Caught Juvenile Pikeperch, Sander lucioperca to dry feed using different types of food / Altun T. et al. // Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2008. № 7(1). C. 5—10.
  136. Variability of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L. 1758) cohorts in early life history / Blabolil P. et al. // Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems. 2019. № 420 (43). C. 1—7.
  137. Verreth J., Kleyn K. The effect of biomanipulation of the Zooplankton on the growth, feeding and survival of pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in nursing ponds // Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 1987. № 3(1). Р. 13—23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1987.tb00444.x.
  138. Wang N., Xu X., Kestemont P. Effect of temperature and feeding frequency on growth performances, feed efficiency and body composition of pikeperch juveniles (Sander lucioperca) // Aquaculture. 2009. № 289. Р.70—73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.01.002.
  139. Weaning of juvenile pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca L., and perch, Perca fluviatilis L., to formulated feed / Ljunggren L. // Aquaculture Research. 2003. Vol. 34(4). Р. 281—287. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00805.x.
  140. Weaning of juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) from life food to artificial diet / Hubenova T. et al. // Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2015. № 21. Р. 17—20.
  141. Zakęś Z. Effect of stock density on the survival, cannibalism and growth of summer fry of European pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca L.) fed artificial diets in controlled conditions // Archive Polish Fisheries. 1997. № 5(2). Р.305—311.
  142. Zakęś Z. The effect of body size and water temperature on the results of intensive rearing of pike-perch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) fry under controlled conditions // Archive Polish Fisheries. 1999. № 7. Р. 187—199.
  143. Żakęś Z., Szczepkowski M. Induction of out-of-season spawning of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) // Aquaculture International. 2004. № 12. Р. 1—18. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AQUI.0000017183.40691.7d.
  144. Ƶakḛš Z., Szczepkowski M., Demska-Ƶakḛš K. Pozasezonowy rozród sandacza. Olsztyn : Wydawnictwo IRS, 2005.
  145. Zakęś Z. Out-of-season spawning of cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) // Aquaculture Research. 2007. № 38. Р.1419—1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01831.x.
  146. Żakęś Z., Demska-Żakęś K. Effect of diets on growth and reproductive development of juvenile pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), reared under intensive culture conditions // Aquaculture Research. 2008. № 27(11). Р. 841—845. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.1996.00801.x.
  147. Żakęś Z., Hopko M. Tagging juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) in the cheek with Passive Integrated Transponders (PIT) – impact on rearing indexes and tag retention // Archives of Polish Fisheries. 2013. № 21. Р.243—248. https://doi.org/10.2478/aopf-2013-0025.
  148. Zakęś Z., Demska-Zakęś K. Controlled reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.): a review // Fisheries & Aquatic Life. 2010. № 17(4). Р. 153—170. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-009-0014-z.
  149. Zingel P., Paaver T. Effects of turbidity on feeding of the young-of-the-year pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in fishponds // Aquaculture Research. 2010. № 41. Р. 189—197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02317.
Головна2024№ 3/2024 (69)2024_03-210_233-Symon