pdf35

Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 2026; 2(76): 4-24
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2026.02.004
UDC 639.2(282.247.32)

Received: 30.04.2026
Received in revised form: 09.06.2026
Published: 30.06.2026

Current structure of commercial catches of the Kyiv Reservoir

I. Buzevych, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0001-7526-9774, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
V. Sondak, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID 0000-0001-9968-2715, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne
S. Kurgansky, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0002-4891-9732 Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Purpose. Determination of current structural characteristics of catches of the main fishing gears used in the Kyiv Reservoir as an element of assessing the distribution of the actual fishing pressure and obtaining initial data for fishery management.

Methodology. Ichthyological material was collected from commercial catches of gillnets with a mesh size of a=38–100 mm in the middle part of the Kyiv Reservoir (July–October 2023–2024 and March, July 2025).  In total, 1573 net-day catches of gill nets were studied and 30188 fish specimens were subjected to incomplete biological analysis. Catches were divided by mesh size groups (a=38–40 mm, a=50 mm, a=72–100 mm) with the calculation of the number and biomass by species per 100 net-days of a standard net. The collection and analysis of materials was carried out according to generally accepted methods. The volumes of commercial catches were determined according to official commercial statistics.

Findings. The catches of fine-mesh nets (a = 38–40 mm) at the Kyiv Reservoir were dominated by roach and silver bream, forming the bulk of the catch both in number and weight. It was found that the share of fine-mesh nets accounted for (in terms of number) 50.4–52.3% of the total bream catch and 65.1–87.2% of the pikeperch catch in the analyzed order of nets, i.e. these nets can cause significant bycatch of their juvenile age groups, which in some years reached 40%. High shares of Prussian carp and pikeperch were recorded in nets with a mesh size of 50 mm, but they also caught significant amounts of juvenile bream, which exceeded the permissible bycatch norms, i.e. specialized fishing with these nets requires strict bycatch control. In large-mesh nets (72–100 mm), the basis of the catches was bream and pikeperch. Bream remained the main target of the fishery, providing more than half of the total catch quantity and biomass. In terms of catch per effort of the main commercial species during 2023‒2025, a significant (3.3 times) decrease was noted for roach and silver bream, while pikeperch was characterized by high stability of catches. The relationship between catch per effort and annual catch (r ≈ 0.53; RІ ≈ 0.31) varied significantly across species and was not strong enough to explain the full extent of variability in annual catch.

Originality. New data were obtained and analyzed, which characterize the interannual dynamics of the distribution of catches by the mesh size of commercial gill nets within the framework of scientific support for the protection and use of aquatic biological resources of the Kyiv Reservoir. The theoretical possibility of limited use of catch-per-effort for characterizing commercial fish biomass is shown.

Practical Value. The results obtained were used to develop norms regulating fishing in the Kyiv Reservoir, in particular, commercial fishery regimes for 2025–2026 and scientific rationales for the feasibility of specialized fishing of aquatic bioresources.   

Keywords: reservoir, commercial fishery, catch structure, catch per effort.

REFERENCES

  1. Novitskyi, R., Hapich, H., Maksymenko, M., Kutishchev, P., & Gasso, V. (2024). Losses in fishery ecosystem services of the Dnipro river Delta and the Kakhovske Reservoir area caused by military actions in Ukraine. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1301435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1301435
  2. Honcharov, G., Novitskyi, R., & Hapich, H. (2024). Preliminary assessment of losses for fish farming of the Kharkiv region due to military actions. Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 1(67), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2024.01.004 
  3. Miranda, L. E., & Faucheux, N. M. (2022). Climate change alters aging patterns of reservoir aquatic habitats. Climatic Change, 174, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03432-w
  4. Ribas, L., Piana, P.A., & Henn, C., et al. (2025). Evaluating 36 years of fishing sustainability in a large reservoir. Sci Rep, 15, 3748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88209-8
  5. Utomo, A. D., Aida, S. N., Yosmaniar, Y., Fatah, K., Zaidan, M., & Wulandari, T. N. M. (2024). A Review on the Challenges of Balancing Fisheries Resource Management in Indonesia’s Inland Waters. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33(5), 5003–5015. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/178011
  6. Hogan, J. D., Selwyn, J. D., & Taylor, C. M. (2025). Long-Term Changes in Fish Assemblage Structure Associated with Hydrological Alteration in the Lower Rio Grande/Rio Bravo del Norte. Ichthyology & Herpetology, 113(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1643/i2024024 
  7. Haworth, M. R., & Bestgen, K. R. (2024). Low-head dam fragmentation, habitat alteration, and invasive predators degrade a Western United States stream fish assemblage. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 33(2), e12773. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12773  
  8. Strategy for the Development of the Fisheries Industry of Ukraine for the Period Until 2030. Approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated May 2, 2023 No. 402-r. (2023). Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/402-2023-%D1%80#Text (in Ukrainian).
  9. Buzevych I. Yu., & Tretiak O. M. (2005). Scientific foundations of the directed formation of the ichthyofauna of the Dnieper reservoirs. Problems of reproduction of native fish species, 213–216. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).
  10. Hrynzhevskyi, M. V. (1998). Aquaculture of Ukraine. Lviv: Vilna Ukraina. (in Ukrainian).
  11. Honcharova, O., Shevchenko, V., & Melnychenko, S. (2024). Aspects of optimization of fisheries exploitation of small reservoirs in southern Ukraine on the example of Danilivsky Reservoir. Prospective global scientific trends: monograph, 170–178. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.30890/2709-2313.2024-29-02 
  12. Novitskyi, R. O. (2021). Invasions of alien fish species into Dnieper reservoirs: monograph. Dnipro: LIRA. (in Ukrainian).
  13. Miranda, L. E., & Angulo-Valencia, M. A. (2023). Invasive carps vs. native fish: a first-pass trait-based index for assessing competition threats. Frontiers in Freshwater Science, 4, 1764296. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffwsc.2026.1764296
  14. Solomon, L. E., Pendleton, R. M., & Chick, J. H., et al. (2016). Long-term changes in fish community structure in relation to the establishment of Asian carps in a large floodplain river. Biol Invasions, 18, 2883–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1180-8 
  15. Cuthbert, R. N., Dick, J. T. A., Haubrock, P. J., Pincheira-Donoso, D., Soto, I., & Briski, E. (2024). Economic impact disharmony in global biological invasions. Science of The Total Environment, 913, 169622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169622
  16. Buzevych, I., & Simon, M. (2023). Structural parameters and dynamics of commercial fish catches of Dnieper reservoirs. Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 4(66), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2023.04.017
  17. Morrison, W. E., Oakes, S. A., Karp, M. A., Appelman, M. H., & Link, J. S. (2024). Ecosystem‐level reference points: Moving toward ecosystem‐based fisheries management. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 16(2), e210285. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10285 
  18. Anstead, K. A., Drew, K., Chagaris, D., Schueller, A. M., McNamee, J. E., Buchheister, A., Nesslage, G., Uphoff, Jr. J. H., & Wilberg, M. J., et al. (2021). The path to an ecosystem approach for forage fish management: A case study of Atlantic Menhaden. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 607657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.607657
  19. Wo, J., Xu, B., Ji, Y., Zhang, C., Xue, Y., & Ren, Y. (2024). Species portfolio schemes buffering the risk of overexploitation in mixed fisheries management. Fisheries Research, 274, 106980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2024.106980
  20. Smallhorn-West, P., van der Ploeg, J., & Boso, D., et al. (2022). Patterns of catch and trophic signatures illustrate diverse management requirements of coastal fisheries in Solomon Islands. Ambio, 51, 1504–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01690-z
  21. Цstman, Ц., Sundblad, G., Ljungberg, P., Levin. S., Blass, M., Kaljuste, M., Dahlin, I., Svensson, R., & Olsson, J. (2023). Catches, bycatches and stock indicators of fisheries targeting cyprinids along the Swedish Baltic Sea coast. Fisheries Research, 268, 106829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106829
  22. Zhang, Z., Yang, W., Ding, J., Sun, T., Liu, H., & Liu, C. (2022) Identifying changes in China’s Bohai and Yellow Sea fisheries resources using a causality-based indicator framework, convergent cross-mapping, and structural equation modeling. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 14, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100171 
  23. Kurhanskyi, S., & Buriak, I. (2023). Structural parameters of commercial ichthyofauna of the Kyiv Reservoir. Modern problems of rational use of aquatic bioresources: Proceedings of V International scientific-practical conference, November 8-9, 2023. Kyiv, 114–116. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.61976/conf.IF-2023-5
  24. Buzevich, I. (2012). Indices of biodiversity of ichthyofauna of the Dnieper reservoirs as factors affecting the amount of commercial fish catches. Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 1, 4–9. (in Ukrainian).
  25. Rudik-Leuska, N. (2013). Structural indices of populations of major commercial fishes of the Kremenchuk Reservoir. Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 2, 25–31. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2013.02.025
  26. Nazarov, A., & Borisenko, A. (2013). Current state of commercial ichthyofauna of the Dniprodzerzhinsk Reservoir. Fisheries science of Ukraine, 4, 38–49. (in Ukrainian). http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/fsu2013.04.038
  27.  Methods for Collection and Processing of Ichthyological and Hydrobiological Materials for the Purpose of Determining Limits of Commercial Fish Removal from Large Reservoirs and Estuaries of Ukraine: Approved by order of the State Committee for Fisheries of Ukraine № 166 15.12.98. (1998). Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).
  28. Rules for industrial fishing in inland fishery water bodies (their parts): Approved by order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine dated April 10, 2023 No. 785, registered with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on April 24, 2023 under No. 665/39721 (2023). Database «Legislation of Ukraine». zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0665-23#Text  (in Ukrainian).
  29. Sondak, V., Kurgansky, S., Zakharchenko, I., Drogan, G., & Koba, S. (2023). Prospects of commercial exploitation of Prussian carp in the Kyiv reservoir. Fisheries Science of Ukraine, 2(64), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2023.02.042
  30. Hoyle, S. D., Campbell, R. A., Ducharme-Barth, N. D., Grьss, A., Moore, B. R., Thorson, J. T., Tremblay-Boyer, L., Winker, H., Zhou, S., & Maunder, M. N. (2024). Catch per unit effort modelling for stock assessment: A summary of good practices. Fisheries Research, 269, 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106860
Home2026№ 2/2026 (76)2026_02-004_024-Buzevych