pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2025; 3(73): 25-56
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2025.03.025
UDC 639.311(477.43)

Current status and prospects of the development of pond aquaculture in Khmelnytskyi region on the example of PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”

V. Oborskyi, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0009-0001-1602-3798, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
H. Kurinenko, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0001-9365-7578, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
M. Simon, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID 0000-0002-7295-8790, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
V. Pryimak, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0009-0005-2054-0543, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
I. Hrytsyniak, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0003-1419-8284, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
U. Kuts, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0003-4073-6322, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Purpose. To characterize the current state of aquaculture in the Khmelnytskyi region and determine the contribution to the development of this industry of pond farms that are part of PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”.

Methodology. The material for the study was the author’s own data from many years of research in accordance with approved fundamental and applied topics of scientific research. The work uses traditional general scientific methods of formal logic, in particular analysis and synthesis, deductive and inductive. The object of the study was the Khmelnytskyi region and PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”, and the subject was the peculiarities of the development and management of fisheries in them. This choice is due to their many years of significant contribution to the development of fisheries science and the industry in general, as well as a significant level of social responsibility of business, which is especially important during national resistance during a full-scale war.

Findings. The article analyzes a number of historical sources regarding the development of fish farming in the Khmelnytskyi region. Data on the current state of aquaculture in the Khmelnytskyi region and the development of PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp” as a structural link of breeding work are systematized and presented. Special attention is paid to today’s problems.

Originality. For the first time, the historical aspects and current state of pond aquaculture in the Khmelnytskyi region have been comprehensively researched and highlighted, as well as the prospects for the development of the fish farming industry using the example of PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”.

Practical Value. The results of the conducted research will allow determining the current state of development for pond farms in the Khmelnytskyi region, and assessing the conducted research on commercial cultivation and the development of selection and breeding reserch works. Analysis of breeding performance indicators will serve as the basis for developing breeding programs to improve the productivity of Ukrainian carp breeds.

Keywords: industrial crossbreeding, hybrids, pure lines, weight, survival, growth rate, age-1+, fish productivity.

REFERENCES

  1. Khilchevskyi, V. K. (2001). Entsyklopediia suchasnoi Ukrainy. Dziuba, I. M. (Ed.). Kyiv: Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy.
  2. Hrebin, V. V., et al. (2014). Vodnyi fond Ukrainy: Shtuchni vodoimy – vodoskhovyshcha i stavky. Khilchevskyi, V. K. (Ed.). Kyiv.
  3. Shvets, H. I., Drozd, N. I., & Levchenko, S. P. (1957). Kataloh richok Ukrainy. Mokliak, V. I. (Ed.).Kyiv.
  4. Pro zatverdzhennia Zon akvakultury (rybnytstva) ta ryboproduktyvnosti po rehionakh Ukrainy. Nakaz № 45 Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy vid 30.01.2013 r.; zareiestrovano v Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy 11 liutoho 2013 r. za № 240/22772. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0240-13#Text.
  5. FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Rome: FAO.
  6. Miao, W., & Wang, W. (2020). Trends of aquaculture production and trade: Carp, tilapia, and shrimp. Asian Fisheries Society, 33, 1-10.
  7. Lasner, T., Mytlewski, A., Nourry, M., Rakowski, M., & Oberle M. (2020). Carp land: Economics of fish farms and the impact of region-marketing in the Aischgrund (DEU) and Barycz Valley (POL). Aquaculture, 519, 734731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734731.
  8. Shekk, P. V., & Burhaz, M. I. (2022). Akvakultura prisnovodnykh i morskykh ryb, moliuskiv i bezkhrebetnykh (vidtvorennia i vyroshchuvannia, svitovyi dosvid). Odesa: Odeskyi derzhavnyi ekolohichnyi universytet.
  9. Newton, R., Zhang, W., Xian, Z., McAdam, B., & Little, C. D. (2021). Intensification, regulation and diversification: The changing face of inland aquaculture in China. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 50, 1739-1756.
  10. Hrytsynyak, І. I., Kurinenko, G. A., & Gurbik, V. V. (2022). Native Types of Carp in Aquaculture of Ukraine (a Review). Hydrobiological Journal, 58(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1615/HydrobJ.v58.i1.40.
  11. Balon, E. K. (1995). Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio: From Roman gourmets to the swimming flowers. Aquaculture, 129, 3-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00227-F.
  12. Balon, E. K. (2004). About the oldest domesticates among fishes December. Journal of Fish Biology, 65(s1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00563.x.
  13. Horváth, L.,  Kovács, É., Csorbai, B., Hegyi, Á., Lefler, K., Müller, T., & Urbányi, B. (2022). Carp Breeding in the Carpathian Basin with a Sustainable Utilization of Renewable Natural Resources. Life, 12(10), 16-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101661.
  14. Kohlmann, K., Kersten, P., & Flajšhans, M. (2005). Microsatellite-based genetic variability and differentiation of domesticated, wild and feral common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations. Aquaculture, 247, 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.024.
  15. Tang, G., Lv, W., Sun, Z., Cao, D., Zheng, X., Tong, G., Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Kuang, Y. (2020). Heritability and quantitative trait locus analyses of intermuscular bones in mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture, 515, 734601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734601.
  16. Vandeputte, M. (2003). Selective breeding of quantitative traits in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio): A review. Aquatic Living Resource, 16, 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(03)00056-1.
  17. Vandeputte, M., Kocour, M., Mauger, S., Dupont-Nivet, M., De Guerry, D., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Vallod, D., Chevassus, B., & Linhart, O. (2004). Heritability estimates for growth-related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture, 235(1-4), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.019.
  18. Vandeputte, M., Kocour, M., Mauger, S., Rodina, M., Launay, A., Gela, D., Dupont-Nivet, M., Hulak, M., & Linhart, O. (2008). Genetic variation for growth at one and two summers of age in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): Heritability estimates and response to selection. Aquaculture, 277(1-2), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.02.009.
  19. Nielsen, H. M., Ødegård, J., Olesen, I., Gjerde, B., Ardo, L., Jeney, G., & Jeney, Z. (2010). Genetic analysis of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains: I: Genetic parameters and heterosis for growth traits and survival. Aquaculture, 304, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.016.
  20. Hulak, M., Kaspar, V., Kohlmann, K., Coward, K., Tešitel, J., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Kocour, M., & Linhart, O. (2010). Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and differentiation of foreign common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains farmed in the Czech Republic. Aquaculture, 298(3-4), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.10.021.
  21. Hulata, G. (1995). A review of genetic improvement of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and other cyprinids by crossbreeding, hybridization and selectio. Aquaculture, 129(1-4), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00244-I.
  22. Vandeputte, M., Peignon, E., Vallod, D., Haffray, P., Komen, J., & Chevassus, C. (2002). Comparison of growth performances of three French strains of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using hemi-isogenic scaly carp as internal control. Aquaculture, 205(1-2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00661-5.
  23. Prchal, M., Kocour, M., Vandeputte, M., Kause, A., Vergnet, A., Zhao, J., Gela, D., Kašpar, V., Genestout, L., Bestin, A., Haffray, P., & Bugeon, J. (2020). Morphological predictors of slaughter yields using 3D digitizer and their use in a common carp breeding program. Aquaculture, 520, 734993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734993.
  24. Yingchutrakul, М. M., Wasinnitiwong, N., Benjakul, S., Singh, A., Zheng, Y., Mubango, E., Luo, Y., Tan, Y., & Hong, H. (2022). Asian Carp, an Alternative Material for Surimi Production: Progress and Future. Foods, 11, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091318.
  25. Pro zatverdzhennia antoninsko- zozulenetskykh vnutrishnoporodnykh typiv ukrainskoi ramchastoi ta ukrainskoi luskatoi porid koropa. Nakaz ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy № 24 vid 24.01.2021. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0024555-10#Text
  26. Pro zatverdzhennia halytskoho vnutrishno - porodnoho typu ukrainskoi ramchastoi porody koropa. Nakaz Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy № 377 vid 23 lystopada 2021 roku. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0024555-10#Text
  27. Pro zatverdzhennia nesvytskykh vnutrishnoporodnykh typiv ukrainskoi ramchastoi ta ukrainskoi luskatoi porid koropa. Nakaz ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0024555-10#Text.
  28. Zastavetska, O. V., Zastavetskyi, B. I., & Ditchuk, I. L. (1995). Heohrafiia Khmelnytskoi oblasti. Ternopil.
  29. Herenchuk, K. I. (Ed.). Pryroda Khmelnytskoi oblasti. Lviv: Vyshcha shkola.
  30. Wikipedia. uk.wikipedia.org. Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki.
  31. Ozera Khmelnychchyny. www.tovtry.km.ua. Retrieved from : https://web.archive.org/web/20080609110450/http:/www.tovtry.km.ua/ua/history/voda_hmel/04.html.
  32. Shcho take akvakultura? Yii vydy ta napriamy. www.od.darg.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://od.darg.gov.ua/_shcho_take_akvakuljtura_jiji_0_0_0_1568_1.html.
  33. Zvit Derzhrybahenstva pro akvakulturu (2020–2023 rr). www.darg.gov.ua. https://darg.gov.ua/_ogljad_virobnictva_produkciji_0_0_0_13699_1.html.
  34. Vermenych, Ya. (2013). Khmelnytska oblast. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy. (Vol. 10. T-Ya). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
  35. Althaim, L. (2004). Istorychni osoblyvosti ta chynnyky, shcho vplynuly na formuvannia silskoho naselennia Khmelnytskoi oblasti. Istoriia ukrainskoi heohrafii. Vseukrainskyi naukovo-teoretychnyi chasopys, 2(10). Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky.
  36. Yesiunin, S. Administratyvno-terytorialnyi podil Zaslavshchyny naprykintsi XVIII – pochatku XXI st. www.myslenedrevo.com.ua. Retrieved from: https://www.myslenedrevo.com.ua/uk/Sci/Local/Zaslav/Empires/AdminDivision.html.
  37. Haidai, L. (2000). Istoriia Ukrainy v osobakh, terminakh, nazvakh i poniattiakh. Lutsk: Vezha.
  38. Artiukh, L. F., & Banushok, V. H., et al. (1994). Podillia. Kyiv: Dolia.
  39. Tomilenko, V. H., Bekh, V. V., Oleksiienko, O. O., & Pavlishchenko, V. M. (2012). Strukturyzatsiia ukrainskykh porid koropa. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 83-87.
  40. Oleksiienko, O. O., Bekh, V. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Pavlishchenko, V. M., & Osipenko, M. I. (2012). Vykorystannia bezperervno polipshuvanoho vidboru v selektsii ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 78-87.
  41. Vodnyi kodeks Ukrainy. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/213/95-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
  42. Zakon Ukrainy pro akvakulturu. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5293-17#Text.
  43. Ukrainska rybovodna kompaniia www.hrh.com.ua. Retrieved from:  https://www.hrh.com.ua/.
  44. Oborskyi, V. P., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Osipenko, M. I., & Kurinenko, H. A. (2022). Rol antoninsko-zozulenetskoho koropa v selektsiino-pleminnii spravi Ukrainy (Ohliad). Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 3, 31-53. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2022.03.031.
  45. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii Derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy rozvytku ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1437-2015-%D1%80#Text.
  46. Nakaz №21 vid 06 sichnia 2021 roku Ministerstva rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. minagro.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://minagro.gov.ua/ye-tvarynnytstvo.
  47. Oborskyi, V. Р., Kurinenko, H. A., & Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2023). Productive and reproductive parameters of the first selective breeding generation of Antonino-Zozulenets intrabreed types of Ukrainian frame and scaly carp breeds. Agrology, 6(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.32819/021202.
  48. Oleksiienko, O. O., Osipenko, M. I., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Oborskyi, V. P., Bekh, V. V., & Hankevych, B. O. (2018). Otsinka reproduktyvnykh pokaznykiv koropa (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) PAT Khmelnytskrybhosp. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 4, 49-56.
  49. Krasnopolska, O. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Kurinenko, H. A., & Syrovatka, D. A. (2022). Otsinka reproduktyvnykh pokaznykiv ta osoblyvosti rannoho ontohenezu retsyproknykh pomisei antoninsko-zozulenetskoho ta halytskoho vnutrishnoporodnoho typu ukrainskoi ramchastoi porody koropa. XXIX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, July 26–29, 2022: proceed. Stockholm, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.46299/ISG.2022.1.29.
  50. Krasnopolska, O. V., & Kurinenko, H. A. (2023). Vykorystannia pomisnykh koropiv, otrymanykh z zastosuvanniam selektsiinykh linii antoninsko-zozulenetskykh ta halytskykh koropiv v akvakulturi Polissia Ukrainy. Suchasni problemy ratsionalnoho vykorystannia vodnykh bioresursiv: V Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., m. Kyiv, 8-9 lyst. 2023 r.: mater. Kyiv.
  51. Kurinenko, H. A., Kuts, U. S., Ostapchuk, M. S., & Yurchak, S. V. (2025). Analiz rybnytsko-biolohichnykh pokaznykiv pomisnykh dvolitok koropa, otrymanykh metodom syntetychnoi selektsii, v zoni Polissia Ukrainy. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1(71), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2025.01.083.
  52. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro rybne hospodarstvo, promyslove rybalstvo ta okhoronu vodnykh bioresursiv”. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3677-17#Text.
  53. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro tvarynnyi svit”. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2894-14#Text.
  54. Pro zatverdzhennia Pravyl liubytelskoho rybalstva. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1412-22#Text.
Home2025№ 3/2025 (73)2025_03-025_056-Oborskyi