pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2025; 1(71): 83-102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2025.01.083
UDC 639.371:639.3.032(477)

Analysis of productive and biological parameters of age-1+ carp crossbreed obtained by synthetic selection method in the Polissya zone of Ukraine

H. Kurinenko, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0001-9365-7578, Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv
U. Kuts, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0003-4073-6322, Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv
М. Ostapchuk, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0009-0003-6902-8132, Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv
S. Yurchak, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0009-0000-3798-9068, Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv 

Purpose. To provide a comprehensive productive and biological characteristic and conduct a comparative analysis of the main productive parameters between purebred age-1+ Lyubin scaly carps and crossbreeds, which were obtained from crossing the offspring of Antoniny-Zozulenets, Galician and Lyubin intrabreed types of Ukrainian carp breeds in pond farms of the Polissya zone.

Methodology. The material for the study were crossbreed (♀LSC×♂AZFC; ♀AZSC×♂LSC; ♀AZFC×♂GFC) and purebred age-1+ (♀LSC×♂LSC) of different structural units of the Ukrainian scaly and framed carp breeds. Their productive and biological parameters were evaluated according to productive characteristics (body weight dynamics, fish productivity, survival rate), which were investigated during test catches through the growing season and according to the results of the autumn harvest using generally accepted methods in aquaculture. For exterior assessment of tabke age-1+ fish, they were weighed and their length, height, and body girth were measured. Measurements were made with a centimetre tape with an accuracy of 1 mm. Individual weighing was carried out on electronic commercial scales with an accuracy of 1 g. Based on the measurement results, following main exterior indices were determined and analysed: body girth, body length to height ratio and condition factor.

Findings. The study showed that among the crossbreed carps, the highest weight gain was observed in age-1+ carps obtained from crossing scaly Antoniny-Zozulenets females with Lyubin males, in which the average seasonal specific weight gain was 2.17%/day. Among framed crossbred carps, the highest specific weight gain was observed in age-1+ Galician males - 2.08%/day, while that in Lyubin scaly carps was the lowest - 1.73%/day. The yield from cultivation of crossbreed age-1+ carps with various genesis was within 86.9–91.4%, and that in Lyubin scaly was 92.4%. The fish productivity of the experimental ponds was 526.2 and 675.6 kg/ha with the superiority of crossbreed framed carp from Galician males over Lyubin scaly carps in the first pond and crossbreed scaly carp over linear and framed carp in the second experimental pond. The maximum yield of clean fillets was observed in crossbreed framed age-1+ carps obtained from Galician males - 51.42%.

Originality. For the first time in the conditions of Polissya, the productive and biological parameters of age-1+ carps of crossbred carp groups obtained from crossing the Antoniny-Zozulenets, Lyubin and Galician crossbreed types of Ukrainian scaly and framed carps were obtained and comprehensively studied.

Practical Value. The results of the analysis of productive and biological parameters demonstrate the effectiveness of the using industrial crossing of carp breeds from different ecological and geographical zones in modern fish farming practice, the crossing of which provides a high heterosis effect, which contributes to increasing the fish productivity of pond farms and, accordingly, allows recommending these crosses for use as new promising lines for industrial cultivation in the Polissya zone of Ukraine.

Keywords: industrial crossbreeding, crossbreds, pure lines, weight, survival, weight gain, age-1+ fish, fish productivity.

REFERENCES

  1. Bekh, V. V., & Osipenko, M. I. (2015). Selektsiino-pleminna robota i protses vyvedennia maloluskatoho vnutrishnoporodnoho typu ukrainskoi ramchastoi porody koropa. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 8, 20-352. agrovisnyk.com. Retrieved from: https://agrovisnyk.com/pdf/ua_2015_08_06.pdf.
  2. Lou, Y. D. (2006). Fish Breeding. Cross Breeding. Beijin: China Agriculture Press. agriscigroup.us. Retrieved from: https://www.agriscigroup.us/articles/IJAFS-3-126.php.
  3. Li, W. T. (2000). Animal Genetics and Breeding. Utilization of Heterosis. China Agricultural University press, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1103-7.
  4. Krasnopolska, O. V. (2021). Selektsiia, yak osnovnyi napriamok naukovykh doslidzhen ta osnovni etapy selektsiino-pleminnoi roboty v Ukraini (ohliad). Ryboghospodarsjka nauka Ukrajiny, 4, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2021.04.115.
  5. Shyshman, H. F., Bekh, V. V., Martseniuk, V. P., Martseniuk, N. O., & Plishch, Yu. (2019). Otsinka heterozysu u pomisnykh tsoholito za skhreshuvannia vnutrishnoporidnykh typiv koropa. Tvarynnytstvo ta tekhnolohii kharchovykh produktiv, 3, 74-79. animalscience.com.ua. Retrieved from: https://animalscience.com.ua/uk/journals/tom-10-3-2019.
  6. Oleshko, M. O., Bekh, V. V., Oleshko, O. A., & Heiko, L. (2020). Rybnytsko-biolohichne otsiniuvannia pomisnykh koropiv ukrainskoi selektsii na pershomu rotsi zhyttia. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva, 1, 132-141. rep.btsau.edu.ua. Retrieved from: https://rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/4994/3/Rybnytsko-bioloh_otsinka.pdf.
  7. Krasnopolska, O. V., Vishchur, O. I., Kurinenko, H. A., Hrytsyniak, I. I., & Solopova, K. Y. (2024). Hematological indicators of blood and natural resistance of crossbred generations carp of Galician and Antonin-Zozulenetsk. AACL Bioflux, 17(3), 1055-1063. bioflux.com.ro. Retrieved from: https://bioflux.com.ro/docs/2024.1055-1063.pdf.
  8. Vandeputte, M., Peignon, E., Vallod, D., Haffray, P., Komen, J., & Chevassus, C. (2002). Comparison of growth performances of three French strains of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using hemi-isogenic scaly carp as internal control. Aquaculture, 205, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00661-5.
  9. Liu, Kai, Zhang, Zhiyi, Hou, Xin, Wang, Jun, Chen, Xiaowen, & Wang, Chenghui (2024). Study on morphological characteristics among hybrids of silver carp (♀) × bighead carp (♂) and their parents. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 31(4), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.12264/JFSC2024-0035.
  10. Hulata, G. (1995). A review of genetic improvement of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and other cyprinids by crossbreeding, hybridization and selectio. Aquaculture, 129, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00244-I.
  11. Hayden, B., Pulcini, D., Kelly-Quinn, M., O’Grady, M., Caffrey, J., & McGrath, A., et al. (2010). Hybridization between two cyprinid fishes in a novel habitat: Genetics, morphology and life-history traits. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 169. bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com. Retrieved from: https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-169.
  12. Chaudhuri, H. (1973). Fertility of hybrids of Indian carps and preliminary studies on the F2 generation of carp hybrids. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 5, 195-200. intechopen.com. Retrieved from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71911#:~:text=DOI%3A%2010.5772/intechopen.91946.
  13. Oleksiienko, O. O., & Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2007). Vnutrishnoporidna struktura ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 21-27. fsu.ua. Retrieved from: https://fsu.ua/images/jurnal/2007-01/2007-01_21-27Oleksiyenko.pdf.
  14. Oleksiienko, O. O., Bekh, V. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Pavlishchenko, V. M., & Osipenko, M. I. (2012). Vykorystannia bezperervno polipshuvanoho vidboru v selektsii ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 78-87. fsu.ua. Retrieved from: https://fsu.ua/images/jurnal/2012-01/2012-01_078-87Oleksiyenko.pdf.
  15. Hulak, M., Kaspar, V., Kohlmann, K., Coward, K., Tešitel, J., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Kocour, M., & Linhart, O. (2010). Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and differentiation of foreign common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains farmed in the Czech Republic. Aquaculture, 298, 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.10.021.
  16. Vandeputte, M., Kocour, M., Mauger, S., Dupont-Nivet, M., De Guerry, D., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Vallod, D., Chevassus, B., & Linhart, O. (2004). Heritability estimates for growth-related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Aquaculture, 235, 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.019.
  17. Siwicki, A., & Kazun, K., et al. (2010). Kształtowanie się nieswoistej odpornoœci humoralnej u samic trzech linii karpia hodowanego w Polsce. Komunikaty rybacke, 3, 6-8.
  18. Scribner, K. T., Page, K. S., Meredith, L., & Bartron, M. L. (2001). Hybridization in freshwater fishes: A review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10, 293-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016642723238.
  19. Chevassus, B. (1983). Hybridization in fish. Aquaculture, 33, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90405-2.
  20. Liss, S. A, Lamera, J. T, Sass, G. G., & Suski, C. D. (2016). Physiological consequences of hybridization: Early generation backcrossing decreases performance in invasive bigheaded carps. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 4, 543-554. scilit.com. Retrieved from: https://www.scilit.com/publications/4d6c6f123e91d2ac7ebc83fe047e810b#:~:text=https%3A//doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2016.1188426.
  21. Zeng, Q., Sun, C., Dong, J., Tian, Y., & Ye, X. (2017). Comparison of the Crossbreeding Effects of Three Mandarin Fish Populations and Analyses of the Microsatellite Loci Associated with the Growth Traits of F1 Progenies. International Journal of Aquaculture and Fishery Sciences, 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-8400.00002.
  22. Hermawan, D., et al. (2024). Arisandy2 Reproductive performance of crossbreeding between local female and imported male koi at CV. Indokoi Malang. BIO Web Conf.: The 5th  International Conference on Bioenergy and Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Technology, 143. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414302005.
  23. Hrynzhevskyi, M. V., Sherman, I. M., & Hrytsyniak, I. I., et al. (2006). Orhanizatsiia selektsiino-pleminnoi roboty v rybnytstvi. Kyiv: Rybka moia.
  24. Bekh, V. V. (2011). Otsinka plidnykiv maloluskatoho koropa lebedynskoi zavodskoi linii za eksteriernymy ta reproduktyvnymy pokaznykamy. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 58-62. fsu.ua. Retrieved from: https://fsu.ua/images/jurnal/2011-01/2011-01_052-62Bekh.pdf.
  25. Bekh, V. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Oleksiienko, O. O., & Osipenko, M. I. (2014). Perspektyvy selektsiino-pleminnoi spravy u rybnytstvi Ukrainy. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 9, 31-34. irbis-nbuv.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=vaan_2014_9_9.
  26. Hrishyn, B. O. (2014). Rezultaty oderzhannia pomisnykh koropiv vid skhreshchuvannia antoninsko-zozulenetskoho i liubinskoho vnutrishnoporidnykh typiv zavodskym metodom. Suchasni problemy selektsii, rozvedennia ta hihiieny tvaryn: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats, 1, 93-97.
  27. Kurinenko, H. A., & Krasnopolska, O. V. (2022). Kharakterystyka retsyproknykh pomisei antoninsko-zozulenetskykh ta halytskykh ramchastykh koropiv na pershomu rotsi zhyttia. Vodni bioresursy ta akvakultura, 2, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.32851/wba.2022.2.8.
  28. Suzuki, R. (1980). Improvement of Quality in the Common Carp by Crossbreeding. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 46(12), 1427-1434. jstage.jst.go.jp. Retrieved from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/suisan1932/46/12/46_12_1427/_pdf.
  29. Bakos, J., & Gorda, S., (1995). Genetic improvement of common carp strains using intraspecific hybridization. Aquaculture, 129, 183-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00245-J.
  30. Hrytsynyak, I. I., Gurbik, V. V., & Kurinenko, H. A., (2022). Native Types of Carp in Aquaculture of Ukraine (a Review). Hydrobiological Journal, 58, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1615/HydrobJ.v58.i1.40.
  31. Kurinenko, H. A., Kuts, U. S., Ostapchuk, M. S., & Yurchak, S. Yu. (2024). Antoninsko-zozulenetskyi vnutrishnoporodnyi typ ukrainskykh porid koropa yak perspektyvna lanka akvakultury Prykarpattia. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 3, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2024.03.094.
  32. Tomilenko, V. H., Hrytsyniak, I. I., & Tuchapskyi, Ya. V. (1999). Rybohospodarska otsinka koropiv liubinskoho vnutrishnoporidnoho typu ukrainskoi luskatoi ta ramchastoi porid na pershomu ta druhomu rotsi zhyttia. Rybne hospodarstvo, 49-50, 125-129.
  33. Instruktsiia z orhanizatsii pleminnoi roboty v koropivnytstvi Ukrainy. (1995). Intensyvne rybnytstvo. Kyiv
  34. Pravdyn, Y. F. (1979). Rukovodstvo po yzuchenyiu rуb. Moskva: Pyshchevaia promуshlennost.
  35. Metodyka doslidzhen u rybnytstvi:metodychnyi posibnyk dlia pidhotovky bakalavriv za spetsialnistiu 6.090201 «Vodni bioresursy ta akvakultura. (2013). Kyiv.
  36. Chuhunova, N. Y. (1952). Metodyka іzuchenіia vozrasta і rosta ryb. Moskva: Sovetskaia nauka.
  37. Instruktsyy po fyzyoloho-byokhymycheskym analyzam ryb (1984). Moskva: VNYYPRKh.
  38. Mykytiuk, P. V. (1999). Tekhnolohiia pererobky ryby. Kyiv.
Home2025№ 1/2025 (71)2025_01-083_102-KurinenkoKorop