pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2024; 4(70): 127-144
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2024.04.127
UDC 639.3.032:639.371.52(477+438)

Assessment of the effect of heterosis by productive parameters of young-of-the-year carps obtained from crossing Ukrainian and Polish breeds

H. Kurinenko, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv
A. Derenko, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS, Kyiv

Purpose. The aim of the work was to study the effectiveness of using structural units of Ukrainian carp breeds in combination with Polish carp lines to obtain new promising lines for industrial cultivation at different levels of aquaculture intensification.

Methodology. The studies were conducted in pond conditions at the State Enterprise Research Farm “Lviv Research Station” and at the State Enterprise Research Farm “Nyvka”. Females of the Galician and few scaled Nyvka hatchery line of intrabreed carp types and framed and scaly males of the Polish line imported from the fish farm of the Olsztyn Voivodeship were selected for crossing.

During the autumn harvest, weights and lengths of fish juveniles were determined, based on which the main body composition indices were calculated: body length to height ratio (l/H), girth (l/O), and the Fulton’s condition factor (CF) was determined. The heterosis effect for the main productive parameters was calculated by exceeding the corresponding parameter in the inbred group over that of the original maternal line.

The data obtained as a result of the experiments was processed using a graphic method. The significance of differences between obtained values was tested using ANOCA in MS Excel.

Findings. It was found that in the first year of cultivation, the offspring obtained from crossing carp of Ukrainian and Polish selection allow, on average, increasing the productivity of fish farming water bodies compared to pure lines by 48.1% using Galician females, and by 54.6% using Nyvky females. The maximum manifestation of heterosis phenomenon in terms of individual body weight was observed in interbred YOYs obtained from Nyvky females, the superiority of which over pure lines was: for framed – 246.8%, for scaly – 230.5%. This parameter in YOYs obtained from a similar cross with Galician females, compared to the pure line, was 132.0% for framed and 143.5% for scaly. At the same time, the crossbred YOYs were characterized by a survival rate above 40.0% and exceeded the standard rate by 2–7%.

Originality. For the first time, crossbred carp offspring from crossing offspring of Ukrainian and Polish selection in conditions of industrial cultivation in pond farms in Ukraine were obtained and comprehensively studied, the results of which showed that the heterosis effect on fish productivity on breeding ponds was at the level of 148.1–154.6%.

Practical Value. The results obtained demonstrate the effectiveness of using new foreign carp lines to improve the genetic structure of domestic carp farming. A comprehensive analysis of the productive and biological parameters of the offspring obtained from the crossing of Polish lines and structural units of Ukrainian carp breeds will allow developing strategies for obtaining and growing new highly productive lines and crosses.

Keywords: carp, genesis, survival, weight, growth rate, fish productivity, heterosis.

REFERENCES

  1. Jezierski, A., & Leszczyńska, С. (2003). Historia Gospodarcza Polski. Warszawa: Key Text, 99-101.
  2. Guziur, J., Białowąs, H., & Milczarzewicz, W. (2003). Ribactwo stawowe w stavach karpiowych, urządzeniach pezemysłowych oraz małych zbiornikach śródlądowych. Warszawa.
  3. Oleksiienko, O. O., & Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2007). Vnutrishnoporidna struktura ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 21-27.
  4. Tomilenko, V. H., Bekh, V. V., Oleksiienko, O. O., & Pavlishchenko, V. M. (2012). Strukturyzatsiia ukrainskykh porid koropa. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 83-87.
  5. Martseniuk, V. P., & Hutsol, A. V. (2013). Porody ta porodni hrupy maloluskatykh koropiv. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU, 3(73), 95-102.
  6. Oleksiienko, O. O., Bekh, V. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Pavlishchenko, V. M., & Osipenko, M. I. (2012). Vykorystannia bezperervno polipshuvanoho vidboru v selektsii ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 78-87.
  7. Hrytsyniak, I. I., Kurinenko, H. A., & Hurbyk, V. V. (2021). Aboryhenni typy koropa v akvakulturi Ukrainy. Hidrobiolohichnyi zhurnal, 5, 38-47.
  8. Oleksiienko, O. O., Bekh, V. V., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Hrishyn, O. B., Volianskyi, L. S., & Osipenko, M. I. (2015). Do pytannia aprobatsii antoninsko-zozulenetskykh koropiv ukrainskykh porid. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 4, 65-77.
  9. Bekh, V. V., & Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2011). Maloluskatyi korop — analiz osnovnykh rezultativ doslidzhen ta selektsiinoi roboty. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 4, 94-98.
  10. Kurinenko, H. A., Chernyk, Yu. P., Kuts, U. S., Hrytsyniak, I. I., Yurchak, S. Yu., Bobeliak, L. Y., & Bekh, V. V. (2024). Kharakterystyka matochnoho stada nesvytskoho vnutrishnoporodnoho typu ukrainskykh ramchastoi ta luskatoi porid koropa za kompleksom produktyvnykh ta reproduktyvnykh pokaznykiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 76-94. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2024.02.076 
  11. Hurbyk, V. V., Kurinenko, H. A., Striletskyi, O. I., Tkachuk, V. L., & Chernyk, Yu. P. (2021). Do aprobatsii halytskoho masyvu koropa. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 3, 48-59.
  12. Oleksiienko, O. O., et al. (2012). Heterozys u rybnytstvi. Rybne hospodarstvo Ukrainy, 4, 13-23.
  13. Kurinenko, H. A., Kuts, U. S. Yurchak, S. V., Derenko, A. V., & Chernyk, Yu. P. (2024). Perspektyva vykorystannia koropiv zakordonnoi selektsii v akvakulturi Ukrainy. Suchasni problemy ratsionalnoho vykorystannia vodnykh bioresursiv: VI Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia, m. Kyiv, 9 – 10 zhovtnia 2024 r.: mater. Kyiv, 180-183
  14. Hrynzhevskyi, M. V., et al. (2006). Orhanizatsiia selektsiino-pleminnoi roboty v rybnytstvi. Kyiv: Rybka moia.
  15. Martseniuk, V. P. (2013). Heterozys ta promyslova hibrydyzatsiia v rybnytstvi. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia “Tvarynnytstvo”, 7 (23), 155-159
  16. Biolohichni osnovy rybnoho hospodarstva: metodychni vkazivky. (2016). Kyiv: NUBiP Ukrainy, 41.
  17. Bekh, V. V., & Tomylenko, V. H. (2006). Instruktsiia z bonituvannia ukrainskykh porid koropa ta amurskoho sazana. Kyiv: Instytut rybnoho hospodarstva UAAN.
  18. Tomylenko, V. H., Oleksiienko, O. O., & Kucherenko, A. P. (1995). Instruktsiia z orhanizatsii pleminnoi roboty v koropivnytstvi Ukrainy. Intensyvne rybnytstvo: zb. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, 3-33.
  19. Bazalii, V. V., Bekh, V. V., Pylypenko, Yu. V., & Lisnyi, V. A. (2015). Henetyka ryb: Pidruchnyk. Kherson: OLDI-PLIuS.
  20. Sherman, I. M., & Yevtushenko, M. Yu. (2011). Teoretychni osnovy rybnytstva: pidruchnyk. Kyiv.
  21. Marynych, O. M. (Ed.). (1989). Heohrafichna entsyklopediia Ukrainy. (Vol. 1–3). Kyiv: Ukrainska radianska entsyklopediia im. M. P. Bazhana. Vol. 1: A-Zh.
  22. Borbat, M. O., & Baida, L. A. et al. (2003). Haluzevyi zbirnyk normatyvno-tekhnolohichnoi dokumentatsii z rozvedennia ta vyroshchuvannia promyslovo-ottsinnykh ryb. Kyiv.
  23. Shyshman, H. F., Bekh, V. V., Martseniuk, V. P., Martseniuk, N. O., & Plishch, Yu. O. (2019). Otsinka heterozysu u pomisnykh tsoholitok za skhreshchuvannia vnutrishno poridnykh typiv koropa. Tvarynnytstvo ta tekhnolohii kharchovykh produktiv, 10, 3, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal2019.03.074 
  24. Oleshko, M. O., Bekh, V. V., Oleshko, O. A., & Heiko, L. M. (2020). Rybnytsko-biolohichne otsiniuvannia pomisnykh koropiv ukrainskoi selektsii na pershomu rotsi zhyttia. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva, 1, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.33245/2310-9270-2020-157-1-132-141 
  25. Kurinenko, H. A., & Krasnopolska, O. V. (2022). Kharakterystyka retsyproknykh pomisei antoninsko-zozulenetskykh ta halytskykh ramchastykh koropiv na pershomu rotsi zhyttia. Vodni bioresursy ta akvakultura, 2, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.32851/wba.2022.2.8