Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2013; 1(23): 71-79
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2013.01.071 
УДК 639.3:575

pdf35

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE OF UKRAINIAN STRAINS OF CARP (CYPRINUS CARPIO L.) AT DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF REARING

Т. Nagornyuk,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

We investigated genetic structure of the Ukrainian scaled and framed carps based on six genetic-biochemical systems of blood – TF, ALB, EST, СА, MDH, МЕ. Their level actual and expected heterozygosity per locus has been determined, genetic distances and identity index have been calculated. Differentiation of carp groups of different rearing conditions is possible based on the distribution of allele variants of TF, EST, СА, and ME loci.

Key words: carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), alleles, genotype, locus, heterozygosity .

REFERENCES

1. Ayala, F. J. (1977). Adaptive evolution of proteins. Acta Biol. Jugosl., 9, 1-15.
2. Glazko, V. I. (1998). Agroekologicheskiy aspekt biosfery: problema geneticheskogo raznoobraziya. Kyiv : Nora-print.
3. Ludannyy, R. I., Khrisanfova, G. G., & Prizenko, V. K., et al. (2010). Polimorfizm mikrosatellitnykh markerov u porod domashnego karpa (Cyprinus carpio L.) otechestvennoy selektsii. Genetika, 46, 5, 652-658.
4. Koneva, O. Yu., & Dromashko, S. E. (2011). Molekulyarno-geneticheskaya pasportizatsiya lakhvinskoy i tremlyanskoy porodnykh grupp karpa (Cyprinus carpio L.) metodom RAPD-analiza. Vestsі Natsyyanal'nay akademіі navuk Belarusі, 1, 81-88.
5. Perez-Ruzafa, A., Gonzalez-Wanguemert, M., & Lenfant, P., et al. (2006). Effects of fishing protection on the genetic structure of fish populations. Biological conservation, 129, 244-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.040
6. Roark, S. A., Nacci, D., & Coiro, L., et al. (2005). Population genetic structure of a nonmigratory estuarine fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) across a strong gradient of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 3, 717-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/03-687.1
7. Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2008). Biolohichni osoblyvosti ta faktory pidvyshchennia produktyvnosti koropiv liubinskykh vnutrishnoporidnykh typiv, yikh pomisei ta hibrydiv. Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis. Kyiv.
8. Shaklee, J. B., Allendorf, F. W., & Morizot, D. C., et al. (1990). Gene nomenclature for protein-coding loci in fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 119, 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1990)119<0002:gnfpli>2.3.CO;2
9. Davis, B. J. (1964). Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 121, 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x
10. Glazko, V. I., & Sozinov, I. A. (1993). Genetika izofermentov zhivotnykh i rasteniy. Kiev : Urozhay.
11. Korochkin, L. I., Serov, O. L., & Pudovnik, A. I., et al. (1977). Genetika izofermentov. Moskva : Nauka.
12. Swofford, D. L., & Selander, R. B. (1981). Biosys-1: A Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Heredity, 72, 281-283.
13. Lerner, I. M. (1954). Genetic homeostasis. Edinborgh.
14. Altukhov, Yu. P. (1989). Geneticheskie protsessy v populyatsiyakh. Moskva : Nauka.
15. Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583-590.