pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2020; 2(52): 38-52
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2020.02.038
УДК [639.3.043:636.087.73]:639.371.52

Productive and reproductive parameters of carp when adding amaranth seeds to fish feed

R. Palamarchuk, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS, Kyiv
O. Deren, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS, Kyiv
S. Koba, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS, Kyiv

Purpose. Study of the effect of amaranth feed additive on the peculiarities of growth, development, feed efficiency and economic component when rearing age-1+ carp; as well as the reproductive performance of female carp based on an analysis of its nutritional and biologically active properties.

Methodology. Two experiments were conducted in which the effect of feeding of age-1+ and female carp with seeds of Ukrainian high-yielding forage amaranth with biologically active properties "Kharkiv-1" on physiological and productive parameters was analyzed. Carp were fed with granulated compound feed with a protein content of 23%, which was additionally supplemented with ground amaranth seeds by granulation method in the amount of 10% to replace the cereal component, pre-subjected to heat treatment. Piscicultural, breeding, hydrochemical and hydro-biological studies were carried out according to conventional aquaculture methods.

Findings. The main hydrochemical parameters were found to be within piscicultural standards. Development of phyto-, zooplankton and zoobenthos on average for the season both in terms of quantity and biomass practically did not differ in both ponds.

When determining the efficiency of the use of ground amaranth seeds in the feeding of age-1+ carp during the growing season, an improvement in piscicultural parameters was found. In particular, the average weight of fish caught at the end of the growing season in the study group was 10.5%, respectively, the fish productivity was 12.2% higher than in the control, and the feed cost was 10.3% lower. Taking into account the cost of fish seeds and the cost of feed growing, an additional income 9.3% was obtained.

It has been found that the addition of amaranth to the diet of female carp during pre-spawning retention positively affects the production of eggs, their fertilizing capacity, and the viability of larvae obtained. Accordingly, an increase in relative working fertility by 3.4%, the percentage of fertilization of eggs by 3%, and the yield of 3-day larvae by 6.7% in the experimental group were observed.

Originality. During the study, based on the analysis of the nutritional and biologically active properties of amaranth, for the first time its effect on the productive performance of age-1+ carp and the reproductive parameters of female carp was studied, as well as the effectiveness of its use in the diet.

Practical value. Finding feed components with high protein content and suitable for introduction in natural environment of Ukraine is topical and necessary to meet the needs of fish industry. Accordingly, the study of the efficiency of introducing amaranth into the diets of different age groups of carp will have a positive effect on growth, survival and reproductive performance, and will also reduce feed costs.

Key words: amaranth, carp, productivity, reproductive performance, feed costs, survival, efficiency.

REFERENCE

  1. Coffey, D.,  Dawson, K., Ferket, P., & Connolly, A. (2016). Review of the feed industry from a historical perspective and implications for its future. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 4. cambridge.org. Retrived from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-applied-animal-nutrition/article/review-of-the-feed-industry-from-a-historical-perspective-and-implications-for-its-future/A655939BDBB386140F15ECB577F5711C. https://doi.org/10.1017/jan.2015.11 
  2. Korobov, A. P., & Moskalenko, S. P. (Comp.). (2014). Nauchno-obosnovannye normy kormleniya sel'skokhozyaystvennykh zhivotnykh: kratkiy kurs lektsiy. Saratov: Saratovskiy GAU.
  3. Nemo, L. (2019). Faux fish might help aquaculture keep feeding the world. Scientific American, 6. scientificamerican.com. Retrived from https://www.scientificamerican.com /article/faux-fish-might-help-aquaculture-keep-feeding-the-world.
  4. Zheltov, Yu. A. (2008). Ratsionalnoe kormlenie karpovykh ryb v akvakulture. Kyiv: Inkos.
  5. Mavromichalis, I. (2018). 6 alternative protein sources to soybean meal. Feed strategy, 69 (2), 10-15.
  6. Protein sources for the animal feed industry: Expert consultation and workshop. (2002). Bangkok. Retrived from http://www.fao.org/3/y5019e03.htm.
  7. Klimatychni zminy ta silske hospodarstvo. Vyklyky dlia ahrarnoi nauky ta osvity: II Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (2019). Kyiv – Mykolaiv – Kherson.
  8. Shilov, V. N. (2015). Nauchnoe obosnovanie i tekhnologicheskie osnovy povysheniya produktivnosti zhivotnykh pri ispol'zovanii amaranta v kachestve korma i biologicheski aktivnoy dobavki. Exstended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Saransk.
  9. Haltsev, V. P., Stotskyi, P. I., & Sienik, V. B. (2012). Ohliad zastosuvannia amarantu ta odyn zi sposobiv otrymannia amarantovoi olii, yak dzherela skvalenu. Ahrarnyi visnyk Prychornomoria, 63, 188-191.
  10. Karunskyi, O. Y., & Strilets, A. V. (2008). Khimichnyi ta aminokyslotnyi sklad amarantu. Visnyk derzhavnoho ahroekolohichnoho universytetu, 2 (23), 190-192.
  11. Karasova, N. V. (2009). Perspektyvy vykorystannia amarantu. Khranenye y pererabotka zerna, 1, 31-33.
  12. Ryadchikov, V., Omarov, M., & Polezhaev, S. (2010). Ideal'nyy belok v ratsionakh sviney i ptitsy. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii, 2, 49-51.
  13. Hiska, V. V. (2002). Vykorystannia ekstrudovanoho nasinnia amarantu v skladi kombikormiv dlia molodniaku svynei. Exstended abstruct of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv.
  14. Shilov, V. N., Tamimdarov, B. F., Sergeeva, G. Kh., Khirug, S. S., Zharkovskiy, A. P., Mad'yarov, N. A., Nizamutdinov, I. A., & Kekhaberidze, I. B. (2008). Rubtsovoe pishchevarenie u korov poluchavshikh silos iz amaranta. Veterinarnyy vrach, 1, 30-33.
  15. Zral˘, Z., Písafiíková, B., Hudcová, H., Trãková, M, & Herzig, I. (2004). Effect of feedinq amaranth on growth efficiency and health of market pigs. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200473040437 
  16. Pisarikova, B., Lraly, L., Kracmar, S., Trckova, M., & Herzig, I. (2006). The use of amaranth (genus Amaranthus L.) in the diets for broiler chickens. Veterinarni Medicina, 51 (7), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.17221/5560-VETMED 
  17. Beskrovnaya, S. I., Duda, Yu. V., & Rozhkov, V. V. (2010). Opyt primeneniya muki iz semyan amaranta v sostave kombikorma dlya ryb. Stan ta perspektivi vikoristannya vodnogo basseynu Podіllya: promislovі, ekologіchnі, turistichnі aspekti: Mіzhnarodna nauk.-praktych. konf. Kam’yanets'-Podіl's'kiy, 5-6.
  18. Palamarchuk, R. A., Deren, O. V., & Kachai, H. V. (2016). Vplyv zghodovuvannia amarantu (Amaranthus) na rybnytski ta deiaki fizioloho-biokhimichni pokaznyky dvolitok koropa. Rybohoshodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2016.02.073 
  19. Palamarchuk, R. A., & Deren, O. V. (2018). Vyznachennia efektyvnosti vykorystannia amarantu (Amaranthus) v hodivli koropa za riznykh umov vyroshchuvannia. Rybohoshodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2018.02.103 
  20. Palamarchuk, R. A., & Deren, O. V. (2018). Vplyv amarantu Amaranthus (Linnaeus) na yakisni ta produktyvni kharakterystyky dvolitok koropa (Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus)) za vvedennia yoho do skladu ratsionu. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 3, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2018.03.089 
  21. Alekin, O. A. (1970). Osnovy gidrokhimii. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat.
  22. Voda rybohospodarskykh pіdpryiemstv. Zahalnі vymogy ta normy. (2006). SOU-05.01.-37-385:2006. Kyiv: Mіnisterstvo ahrarnoi polіtyky Ukrainy.
  23. Krazhan, S. A., & Khyzhniak, M. I. (2014). Pryrodna kormova baza rybohospodarkykh vodoim. Kyiv: Ahrarna osvita.
  24. Arsan, O. M., Davydov, O. Ya., Diachenko, T. M., Yevtushenko, M. Yu. & Zhukynskyi, V. M. (2006) Metody hidroekolohichnykh doslidzhen poverkhnevykh vod. V. D. Romanenko (Ed.). Kyiv : Lohos.
  25. Opredelitel presnovodnykh bespozvonochnykh Evropeyskoy chasti SSSR (plankton i bentos) (1977). L. A. Kutikova & Ya. I. Starobogatov (Ed.). Leningrad : Gidrometeoizdat.
  26. Zheltov, Yu. O. (2003). Metodychni vkazivky z provedennia doslidiv po hodivli ryb. Rybne hospodarstvo, 62, 23-28.
  27. Limanskiy, A. A., Yarzhombek, A. A., Bekina, E. N., & Andronikov, S. B. (1984). Instruktsiya po fiziologo-biokhimicheskim analizam ryb. Moskva: VNIIPRKh.
  28. Kiselev, I. V. (1980). Biologicheskie osnovy osemeneniya i inkubatsii kleykikh yaits karpovykh ryb. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
  29. Tomylenko, V. H., Oleksiienko, O. O., & Kucherenko A. P. (1995). Instruktsiia z orhanizatsii pleminnoi roboty v koropivnytstvi Ukrainy. Intensyvne rybnytstvo. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, 3-33.
  30. Plokhinskiy, N. A. (1981). Biometriya. Moskva: Moskovskiy universitet.
Home2020№ 2/2020 (52)2020_02-038_052-Palamarchuk_ukr