Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2012; 1(19): 28-35
УДК 598–153 : 597.583.1 (282.247.325.2)

pdf35

PECULIARITIES OF PIKEPERCH (SANDER LUCIOPERCA L.) DIET IN THE KANIV RESERVOIR DURING SPRING PERIOD

A. Didenko,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS, Kyiv
A. Gurbyk,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Institute of Fisheries NAAS, Kyiv

The article examines the diet of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of the Kaniv reservoir during spring period. According to obtained data, its diet included 17 food components, among which 14 fish species. The basis of its diet by the frequency of occurrence consisted perch Perca fluviatilis (2.2%), roach Rutilus rutilus (16.9%), monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis (14.6%) and own juveniles (10.0%). By the relative weight of food objects in the gut content, the dominated species were roach (42.9%) followed by perch (25.8%) and own juveniles (16.2%).

REFERENCES

1. Virbiskas, Ju., Gjarulajtis, A., Misjunene, D., & Sinjavichene, D. (1974). Biologija i promysel sudaka v vodoemah Litvy. Vil'njus : Mintis.
2. Zaitseva, H. Ya. (1970). Zhyvlennia i kormovi vzaiemovidnoshennia ryb Kremenchutskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Biolohiia ryb Kremenchutskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Kyiv : Nauk. dumka, 257-316.
3. Zakharchenko, I. L. (2006). Biolohichna kharakterystyka populiatsii sudaka (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) Kakhovskoho vodoskhovyshcha ta yoho promyslove znachennia. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv.
4. Kirilenko, L. V., & Kostousov, V. G. (2005). Sudak vodoemov Belarusi: biologija i hozjajstvennoe znachenie. Minsk.
5. Kuderskij, L. A. (1961). O vnutrividovyh pishhevyh vzaimootnoshenijah u sudaka (Lucioperca lucioperca (L.)). Voprosy ihtiologii, 1, 3 (20), 533-541.
6. Arsan, O. M., Davydov, O. A., & Diachenko, T. M., et al. (2006). Metody hidroekolohichnykh doslidzhen poverkhnevykh vod. Romanenko, V. D. (Ed.). Kyiv : LOHOS.
7. Metodyka zboru i obrobky ikhtiolohichnykh i hidrobiolohichnykh materialiv z metoiu vyznachennia limitiv promyslovoho vyluchennia ryb z velykykh vodoskhovyshch i lymaniv Ukrainy: № 166: Zatv. nakazom Derzhkomrybhospu Ukrainy 15.12.98. (1998). Kyiv.
8. Nazarov, V., Kolesnik, A., & Tvorovskij, A. (1991). Sostojanie rybnyh zapasov i ih racional'noe ispol'zovanie v vodohranilishhah Har'kovskoj oblasti s introdukciej rastitel'nojadnyh ryb. Har'kov : HGU.
9. Popova, O. (1979). Rol' hishhnyh ryb v jekosistemah. Izmenchivost' ryb presnovodnyh jekosistem. Moskva : Nauka, 13-47.
10. Syrovatskij, I. D. (1953). O biologicheskoj roli i rybohozjajstvennom znachenii sudaka v vodohranilishhah. Zoologicheskij zhurnal, 32, 3, 480-485.
11. Tjunjakov, V. M. (1967). Promyslovo-biologicheskaja harakteristika sudaka Cimljanskogo vodohrani- lishha. Trudy Volgogradskogo otdelenija GosNIORH, III, 141-157.
12. Jashanin, I. I. (1964). Nabljudenija nad biologiej sudaka v central'nom plese Kujbyshevskogo vodohranilishha. Trudy Tatarskogo otdelenija GosNIORH, 10, 238-248.
13. Balik, I., Cubuk, H., Karasahin, B., Ozkok, R., Uysal, R., & Alp, A. (2006). Food and feeding habits of the pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758), population from Lake Egirdir (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30,19-26.
14. Bowen, S. H. (1996). Quantitative description of the diet.Fisheries techniques. 2nd edition. Murphy, B. R., & Willis, D. W. (Ed.). Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society, 513-532.
15. Cortes, E. (1996). A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54726-738.
16. Dorner, H., Hulsman, S., Holker, F., Skov, C., & Wagner, A. (2007). Size-dependent predator-prey relations- hip between pikeperch and their prey fish. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 16307-314.
17. Kangur, A., & Kangur, P. (1998). Diet composition and size-related changes in the feeding of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (Percidae) and pike, Esox lucius (Esocidae) in the Lake Peipsi (Estonia). Italian Journal of Zoology, 65, 255-259.
18. Kangur, A., Kangur, P., & Kangur, K. (2007). Dietary importance of various prey fishes for pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in large shallow lake Vortsjarv (Estonia). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology, Ecology, 56,154-167.
19. Lammens, E. H. R. R., van Densen, W. L. T., & Knijn, R. (1990). The fish community structure in Tjeukemeer in relation to fishery and habitat utilization.Journal of Fish Biology, 36933-945.
20. Lappalainen, J., Olin, M., & Vinni, M. (2006). Pikeperch cannibalism: effects of abundance, size and condition. Annales Zollogici Fennici, 43,35-44.
21. Peltonen, H., Rita, H., & Ruuhijarvi, J. (1996). Diet and prey selection of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in Lake Vesijarvi analyzed with a logit model.Annales Zollogici Fennici, 33481-487.
22. Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M. S., & Inverson, I. L. K. (1971). Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin, 152, 1-105.
23. Sutton, T. M., Cyterski, M. J., Ney, J. J., & Duval, M. C. (2004). Determination of factors influencing stomach content retention by striped bass captured using gillnets.Journal of Fish Biology, 64, 903-910.
24. Van Densen, W. L. T. (1994). Predator enhancement in freshwater communities. Behaviroal Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Cowx, I.G. (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publicaitons Ltd., 102-119.
25. Van Densen, W. L. T., & Grimm, M. P. (1988). Possibilities for stock enhancement of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in order to increase predation on planktivores. Limnologica, 19, 45-49.
26. Vehanen, T., Hyvarinen, P., & Huusko, A. M. (1998). Food consumption and prey orientation of piscivorous brown trout (Salmo trutta) and pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in a large regulated lake.Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 14, 15-22.
27. Yilmaz, M., & Ablak, O. (2003). The feeding behavior of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L., 1758)) Living in Hirfanli Dam Lake. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 27, 1159-1165.